Questions

What is the central topic in the article?
The contest between benefits and principles

What has been proved by researches about this confrontation?
How weaks are these principles which may produce very different opinions in a few minutes gap

Which are the common points of view?
The utilitarian perspective and the deontologiacal perspective

Who are more fonded in to the utilitarian perspective?
People with an upper-income

What may do the last subjects forget its philosophy?
A situation which involve personal feelings.

Where were published the last result?
in the March issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

What defend the deontological aproach?
That aspects of the action itself should count, like whether it adheres to certain rules.

If a hypothetical situation is given to people, what approach would be given as a response?
An utilitarian response.

Where we can find support to this theory?
In the study's results published in in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

What result was obtained by stressing subjects in another study?
The subjects showed a reduction in their utilitarian responses.

What conclusion could be obtained?
There is not evidence of an objective moral because it changes depending on the situation.

New York Times. Our Inconsistent Ethical Instincts
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/how-firm-are-our-principles.html?hp&_r=1&